S2E3613 September 2020

S2E36: Why Schedules Always Fail & the Value of Time with Simon White

S2E36

S2E36: Why Schedules Always Fail & the Value of Time with Simon White

0:000:00
100%

Simon White is originally from New Zealand. He went to university at age 10, specially selected to attend the Creative Writing school. As an adult, to pay his way through university, he worked as a Santa Claus, a seahorse, a cocktail flair barman, and a...

Guest

Simon White

Simon White

Manager of Project Control BAE Australia at BAE

Val Matthews: Hello project people , welcome to the project chatter podcast. I'm Val Matthews and as always I'm joined by my co-host Dale Foong… Dale Foong : Hi folks! Val Matthews: In this episode we talk to Simon White! Welcome to the show Simon... Guest: [guest says hello…] Val Matthews: On this pod we'll be chatting to Simon about Why Schedules Always Fail & The Value of Time... …but before that here’s Dale with the Simon's bio... Simon White is originally from New Zealand. He went to university at age 10, specially selected to attend the Creative Writing school. As an adult, to pay his way through university, he worked as a Santa Claus, a seahorse, a cocktail flair barman, and a catwalk model. His first grown-up employment was as a shark diver and feeder at Christchurch Aquarium in New Zealand, which he did every single day for 3 years. Like all jobs, the novelty wears off eventually … Always having an interest in all things Air and Space, which included getting a pilot’s licence, launching hundreds of model rockets, and founding the Queensland Amateur Rocketry Club, he turned his attention to Aviation as a career. After failing at Military Pilot School, he became an aircraft mechanic, first with QANTAS Defence Services, then with BAE Systems as a Fighter Jet mechanic on the F-18 Hornet program. Like most people in Project Controls, he didn’t find it – it found him. After getting tired of constantly smelling like jet fuel, he volunteered to be a ‘CSA’, not knowing what it was. He was an integral team member in BAE Systems highly successful Critical Chain Project Management implementation. His contribution to the TOC/CCPM Body of Knowledge is the mantra ‘FOCUS and ACT’. He went on to work as Fleet Manager for the 33-strong RAAF BAE Hawk Fighter Jet Trainer fleet, and then Project Controls Management for the Aerospace Business Unit. He currently works as Manager of Project Control for BAE Systems Australia, but doesn’t care much for role titles – it’s more important what you do, not what you’re called – the role is to Deliver Reliable, Repeatable Project Control. He has received 2 BAE Chairman’s Awards for his efforts, and is currently driving the first Certificate IV in Project Control in Australia, to help counteract the Australian market supply/demand imbalance for the discipline. He thrives on thought experiments and interesting questions, like ‘What happens if you turn EVM upside down?’, or ‘Does the baton get dropped inside organisations because of the way we draw our organisational structures?’ Topics: Uni at 10 Pay for uni: Santa, Sea Horse, Catwalk Model First job: Shark Cage diving (3 years) Main topics - Why Schedules Always Fail & The Value of Time What is CSA? TOC/CCPM Body of Knowledge? ‘What happens if you turn EVM upside down?’ ‘Does the baton get dropped inside organisations because of the way we draw our organisational structures?’ Event, Response, Impact Certificate IV Project Control OBS doesn't talk about relationships in a Project Team Dale Foong: End (around 60min mark): [sum up episode] [Guest final words] [Val final words] Well, that's all we have time for on this episode but it doesn't have to stop here... Head over to our Charity Shop and get yourself some gear! All profits go to charity and you'll be helping out children in desperate need of fair opportunities and education! Subscribe via our website and you'll get a link to our online community where you can chat directly to Val, Myself, our expert guests and other community members! For more information, blogs and previous podcasts checkout projectchatterpodcast.com A big thanks to our guest Simon White, thanks as always to Val and thank you for listening. Till next time, we say stay safe, be disruptive and have fun doing it! Bye for now...

Connect

Related Episodes

More conversations on similar topics

S10E219

S10E219: Why 88% of Schedules Fail, and What AI Still Can't Fix with Michael Pink

88% of project schedules don't follow best practice. So why are we so keen to feed that data into AI and trust the output? In this episode, Dale and Val are joined by Michael Pink, Founder of SmartPM, for a sharp conversation on the forensic side of delay and the state of AI in project controls. Mike has analysed hundreds of thousands of schedules and built a career on working out who delayed what, and why nobody could ever agree. His core message: clean data is not the same as honest data. A technically tidy schedule can tell you a story that never happened, and if you point AI at it, you don't get insight, you get a confident wrong answer at scale. What we cover: Mike's route into construction, from a study-abroad debt to KPMG's construction consulting group 25 years of change in the people and process side of scheduling The shift from reactive forensic work to proactive project controls Data honesty vs data quality, and why integrity is the combination of both (framing credited to Isaac Dyer and Carlos Sanchez) The 88% problem: missing logic, inflated float and moving dates The compression factor, and the exact point a schedule becomes infeasible Why a weekly update beats a monthly one, for almost no extra time P6 vs Microsoft Project, and grading schedule quality across 35 metrics Where LLMs genuinely help, and why quantitative AI is still the long game The future of the scheduler: less building and cleaning, more strategy A genuinely optimistic look at where the profession is heading, and why this might be the best time yet to be in project controls. This episode is proudly sponsored by nPlan.nPlan Summer AI Day 2026: Construction Superintelligence takes place in London on Thursday 25 June 2026, with a fireside featuring Peter Hancock, Project Director at National Grid, and Dima Pogorelsky, MD and Partner at BCG. February's event sold out with standing room only. Register here:https://www.nplan.io/events/nplan-summer-ai-day-2026-construction-superintelligence Connect with Michael Pink at https://www.smartpm.com or on LinkedIn. If you enjoyed this episode, help us pay it forward and share it. Stay safe, be disruptive, and have fun doing it.

Listen Now
S6E128

S6E128: Creating Value from Adapting Agility to Project Management with Adrian Pyne

In this week’s pod, we welcomed Adrian Pyne to discuss what project agility really looks like. Adrian is above all a project professional. He has led or rescued Transformation programmes widely from Telcos to eCommerce, Finance. Mining, Aviation, and the public sector. He has designed, built and operated P3 (project, programme and portfolio management) capability, PMOs, and Professional Services businesses. His key skill is the adaptation of best practice successfully. In the last 10 years his consultancy has focussed on two areas. Firstly, what he and colleagues call Organisational Project Management – the creation of an organisation culture that enables projects to Thrive and not merely Survive, or even die. Secondly, on Agile Project Management which too many organisations get badly, and expensively, wrong. He has written Agile Beyond IT, a book on Agile Project Management, showing how it both can be used well beyond the realm of IT Agile software development projects.. Adrian says he will also show that Agile projects can have any life-cycle they need. Adrian remains a frequent speaker around APM and elsewhere, including internationally, and is a visiting lecturer at Nottingham and Southampton University Business Schools, He is also a regular blogger, and he says, is still learning. Adrian is semi-retired and lives with his partner in Dorset. The main topics we discussed on the podcast were as follows: Agile or Agility comes from the Agile Manifesto 2001 (4 values). It was always intended to be used for Software Development Great project professionals are agile! We “do” projects to deliver value. Agile is focused on the delivery of value In the late 90s / early 2000s saw a realization that people deliver projects. If they are not engaged and focused, the project is likely to fail There is no point implementing agile projects if the organizational culture is toxic A hybrid approach between Agile and Critical Path methodologies is often challenging. When you adapt agility to Project Management, it is adapted to everything including planning / scheduling. This needs to keep pace in order for it to work Scrum is a purely software development approach – it is NOT a project management approach Some of the major agile certifications are heavily focused towards IT projects. This needs to be broadened to make it more relevant Agile projects should aim to make an audit trail of the value within a project For every project change request – does it enhance the value? Organisations that do not adopt agility are more likely to be commercial risk Here are links to a some of the topics we discussed: Agile Beyond IT: How to Develop Agility in Project Management in any Sector –  Adrian Pyne https://www.amazon.co.uk/Agile-Beyond-develop-agility-management/dp/1788603273 Manifesto for Agile Software Development - https://agilemanifesto.org/ Jo Lucas – Activating the Mycelium - https://sustainabilitypractitioners.org/rpm-ego-to-eco-in-conversation-with-jo-lucas/ Forbes: How to Succeed in a Project Economy - https://www.forbes.com/sites/rebeccazucker/2022/01/11/how-to-succeed-in-a-project-economy/?sh=668b222a28d9 Agile Beyond IT Newsletter - https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/agile-beyond-it-6922580439241007104/ Tune in next time when we’re joined by Spencer Easton to talk about Takt production vs Takt time.  For more information, blogs or to support our charities visit www.projectchatterpodcast.com  If you'd like to sponsor the podcast get in touch via our website. You can also leave us a voice message via our anchor page and let us know if there's something or someone specific that you would like on the podcast. Proudly sponsored by: JustDo - https://www.justdo.com/ PlanAcademy - https://www.planacademy.com/chatter/ ($75 off any course) InEight - https://ineight.com/ Prosci - https://empower.prosci.com/project-ch... (FREE resource kit) Stay safe, be disruptive and have fun doing it!

Listen Now
S5E124

S5E124: Time Location charting for Linear Projects with Santosh Bhat

In this episode, Martin and Val talk to Santosh Bhat in detail about the lesser-known  Time-location method and how it can be applied on projects. The main topics we discussed on the podcast were as follows: Time chainage is a form of presenting activities from a project schedule. It differs from a Gantt chart by the addition of a second dimension i.e. location. It allows you to plot where activities are occurring Time is shown on the vertical axis which can often confuse people! Location is presented on the horizontal axis. It uses start / end dates and location information that already exists in planning software Time chainage charts are not a new concept. It first originated in the 1800s! The Empire State Building was built using a version of this After educating Project Managers about how to use a time chainage chart, it enabled better conversations around the schedules and stakeholders became more engaged as a result It doesn’t require any specific training to operate, it relies on the programme being fully logic linked The colours on the chart tend to represent project disciplines. It allows discussion on production rate estimates by visualizing activities into shapes Baselines can be assigned 4D is a snapshot of a schedule at a point in time. Time location charts is more appropriate for live scheduling. Both visualization tools are complementary rather than competing The software is particularly useful for what-if scenarios and visualizing the impact of changes Time location charts are not directly linked to time risk allowance in Primavera, it can be used to visualize risk analysis outputs People have the impression time location charts are too complex to implement and too difficult to explain to stakeholders which has prevented major projects from implementing it Tune in next time when we’re re-joined by Dr Alexia Nalewaik to talk social value as a key project ROI criteria.For more information, blogs or to support our charities visit www.projectchatterpodcast.comIf you'd like to sponsor the podcast get in touch via our website.You can also leave us a voice message via our anchor page and let us know if there's something or someone specific that you would like on the podcast.Proudly sponsored by:  JustDo - https://www.justdo.com/  PlanAcademy - https://www.planacademy.com/chatter/ ($75 off any course)  InEight - https://ineight.com/  Prosci - https://empower.prosci.com/project-ch... (FREE resource kit)Stay safe, be disruptive and have fun doing it!

Listen Now

Enjoyed this episode?

Subscribe to never miss a conversation with project experts